#13 in a series of “how-to” guides
Publishing TCQ-labeled photos
12 expectations of the third-party content provider (3P-CP) when publishing others’ TCQ-labeled photos
1. Can point to the photographer
Any 3P-CP that publishes a “Guaranteed TCQ”-labeled photograph may publicly point out at any time that the photographer is solely responsible for labeling a photograph as “Guaranteed TCQ” — even when pointing this out could permanently damage the photographer’s reputation.
2. Will not discriminate
The 3P-CP is expected to not discriminate against a particular “Guaranteed TCQ”-labeled submission by leaving off its label when similar photos in the same context are published with their TCQ labels.
But 3P-CPs do have other options when they believe that a submitted photograph was inappropriately labeled “Guaranteed TCQ.”
3. Will leave the photo as is
The 3P-CP is expected to leave the submitted photograph “as is,” not making any changes other than #1 and #2 on TCQ’s Allowable Changes list.
(Those are the only two Allowable Changes that typically do not affect the content of the photograph in a notable way; see also #1205-1206.)
4. Will not mis-present the photo
The 3P-CP is expected to not compromise the photograph’s TCQ eligibility by misrepresenting or mis-presenting it. This includes not altering or removing any “IC” alert that accompanies the “Guaranteed TCQ” label.
5. Will publish the photographer’s name as submitted
Because the “name” is typically the way that the photographer is professionally known, the 3P-CP is expected to publish the photographer’s name as submitted (including when that name is a URL) in the same context, article, issue, or website as the labeled photograph. [If the submitted name or URL is offensive or problematic, the 3P-CP can exercise its right not to publish the label or even the photo.]
But the 3P-CP does not need to publish the photographer’s name in the same exact location or size as the “Guaranteed TCQ” label (and “IC” if present).
Particularly when the photographer’s submitted “name” is a lengthy URL, the 3P-CP may choose to publish it in a smaller size than, and different location from, the “Guaranteed TCQ” label.
6. Will match the “IC” with the label
The 3P-CP is expected to publish at least the “IC” part of an IC alert in the same font, color, size, and location as the “Guaranteed TCQ” label so that any viewer who sees the “Guaranteed TCQ” label is immediately aware that there is an IC attached. Guide to IC alerts.
7. Is not expected to check photos
8. Is free of blame
The 3P-CP is completely free of responsibility or blame if it turns out that the photographer inappropriately labeled the photograph as “Guaranteed TCQ” (see #1 above).
The term “inappropriately labeled” includes the photographer’s omission of an “IC” alert when one is warranted, and it includes the photographer’s failure to add sufficient explanation to an “IC” alert when more explanation is warranted.
9. Will follow basic labeling protocol
10. Can emphasize photographer’s role
The 3P-CP is free to further emphasize (in any way it chooses) the TCQ photographer’s personal accountability even though the words “Guaranteed TCQ” already denote that the photographer is standing behind the guarantee.
11. Can keep photos online forever
The 3P-CP may — for its own credibility — commit to having any “Guaranteed TCQ”-labeled photos publicly viewable for as long as the 3P-CP’s website exists.
The 3P-CP is never obligated at any time to take down photos to protect the reputation of a photographer who had inappropriately applied the “Guaranteed TCQ” label.
12. Will disclose deviations from this list
The 3P-CP is expected to tell photographers when its policies regarding “Guaranteed TCQ”-labeled photographs differ from the expectations outlined above.
See also the expectations of photographers